Washington Post
By Max Ehrenfreund
August 17, 2015
Donald
Trump, the frontrunner in the race for the Republican presidential
nomination, proposed ending birthright citizenship in the United States
on Sunday. In a six-page
proposal on immigration policy, he also laid out a series of measures
to make it more difficult for immigrants who follow the law to enter the
country. He said his goal is to deport the 11 million immigrants who
are here illegally.
"They have to go," Trump told NBC's "Meet the Press."
The
plan lacks some important details and appears to conflict with some of
Trump's past statements, said Mark Krikorian, the executive director of
the conservative Center
for Immigration Studies. All the same, Krikorian noted, the plan is the
first detailed proposal from any Republican candidate in the 2016 race
so far.
"It's
a very useful step forward, not just for Trump but for all of the
candidates to get this debate away from vacuous generalities," Krikorian
said.
Here we try to answer a few questions you might have about Trump's plan.
1. What does Trump mean by ending birthright citizenship?
Since
an 1898 ruling by the Supreme Court, the 14th Amendment has guaranteed citizenship to anyone born in the United States, even if the parents are
here illegally.
It
isn't clear what Trump means by ending birthright citizenship. The plan
only cites a poll that found that a majority of Americans oppose
birthright citizenship, without
providing any details. (Other polls have found that more Americans
support the law as it exists than favor changing it.)
About
350,000 children were born in the United States in 2009 who had at
least one parent who was an undocumented immigrant, according to the Pew
Research Center. They
accounted for about 8 percent of all babies born here that year. Yet
many of them likely had one parent who was either a citizen or an
immigrant living here legally. Trump's plan does not specify exactly
which babies would be denied citizenship.
In
2010, according to Pew, there were a total of 4.5 million people who
had been born in the United States to parents who were undocumented
immigrants. Trump's plan does
not specify whether their citizenship will be revoked.
Trump's
campaign did not immediately respond to a request for clarification,
but Wonkblog will add more information to this post if and when the
campaign makes it available.
Trump's
plan also does not describe how he would end birthright citizenship. He
would likely have to persuade the Supreme Court to overturn the
longstanding precedent.
Trump could also propose an amendment to the Constitution.
The
nonpartisan Migration Policy Institute has projected that by 2050,
ending birthright citizenship for future children would increase the
undocumented population to
16 million if citizenship were denied to children whose parents are
both here illegally. The figure would increase to 25 million if citizenship were denied to the offspring of at least one unauthorized
immigrant. With no change in law, the unauthorized population
would remain steady at around 11 million.
Migration Policy Institute.
"I
think that's really a recipe for social disaster in the coming
generation. We've seen this in Europe for example," said Hiroshi
Motomura, a professor of law at the
University of California, Los Angeles. "What you have are large
disaffected populations."
Ending
birthright citizenship would have some unexpected consequences,
Motomura noted. Millions of young Americans would be unable to work
legally, reducing the labor
force and the overall strength of the economy.
Additionally,
many babies could be born without citizenship in any country if the
laws of their parents' native country didn't extend citizenship to them.
It is hard to
know how many would fall into this category.
Krikorian
opposes birthright citizenship, but he argues that ending birthright citizenship would only be possible along with amnesty for those
undocumented immigrants
already in the country so that their children would be citizens.
Otherwise, he said, he would be worried about the unauthorized
population—unable to work and without any legal connection to their
native country.
"It's a lot of people," said Krikorian. "I don't think it's a good idea."
Krikorian
said that Trump was the first major presidential contender to endorse
ending birthright citizenship. On Monday, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker
told MSNBC's Kasie
Hunt that he agreed birthright citizenship should be ended.
2. Could Trump actually deport everyone who here is illegally?
Amnesty isn't on Trump's agenda, though. His plan is deportation, which Krikorian dismissed as unrealistic.
"It's
a gimmick," Krikorian said. "He's just making it up as he goes along.
What ever goes into his mind comes out of his mouth. There's no way to
deport 11 or 12 million
people in a short period of time."
To
be sure, ending birthright citizenship wouldn't increase the
unauthorized population if a President Trump deported would-be parents
before they could have children
here.
The
American Action Forum, a conservative research organization, attempted
to estimate the cost of deporting all of the country's undocumented
immigrants, while deporting
new undocumented immigrants who arrive. Doing so would take 20 years
and cost between $420 billion and $619 billion, the group concluded. The
group also predicted that removing a large and important segment of the
American workforce from the country would
reduce the size of the economy by 5.7 percent after two decades.
Trump's
plan would triple the number of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
officers, but it does not discuss how to pay for the additional jail
beds that would be necessary
if federal agents were to arrest three times as many undocumented
immigrants. Nor does it discuss the administrative costs that would come
with processing their cases.
"You
need prosecuting attorneys, and you need enough judges and
magistrates," said Thad Bingel, who served as the chief of staff of
Customs and Border Protection in the
Bush administration.
Though
some details were missing, Bingel said that Trump's discussion of
enforcement in the interior was a realistic discussion of the kinds of
policies that would be
needed to reduce the undocumented population. Focusing on even stricter
security at the border wouldn't be enough, Bingel argued.
Trump
would also require employers to verify their workers' eligibility to
work and would rescind President Obama's executive actions granting a reprieve from deportation to undocumented immigrants who have children who are U.S. citizens or
who were brought here illegally as children by their own parents. Those
actions are held up in the federal courts for now.
3. What about new immigrants who want to come in?
In his plan, Trump also calls again for building a "wall" along the border, without providing details.
"I'd like to see more specifics," Bingel said of the proposed wall.
Trump's
goal isn't simply to reduce the number of immigrants who enter
illegally, though. He also aims to make it harder for immigrants who
follow the rules to get visas.
The
section of the plan dealing with legal immigration is at odds with
Trump's statements earlier this month at the Republican primary debate.
"I don't mind having a big
beautiful door in that wall so that people can come into this country
legally," Trump said.
His
plan would raise the prevailing wage for skilled workers on H-1B visas,
making them more expensive for U.S. employers to sponsor, and impose a
requirement that businesses
hire American workers before requesting an H-1B.
Trump
would require all immigrants to show that they are able to support
themselves before entering the country, and he would place a moratorium
on new green cards issued
to workers abroad.
4. How would Donald Trump pay for it?
In
the plan, Trump accuses Mexico's leaders of "using illegal immigration
to export the crime and poverty in their own country" to the United
States, and he promises to
force Mexico to pay to construct a wall.
In
this plan, Trump calls again for tariffs on Mexican goods as well as
for fees on people crossing the border in order to coerce Mexico's
cooperation. Trump has said
that the North American Free Trade Agreement, which went into effect in
1994, has been "a disaster." The agreement eliminated a number of
tariffs and called for more barriers to be lifted over time.
"This kind of posturing with regard to Mexico isn't helpful," Krikorian said.
Since
2007, as many undocumented migrants have been returning to Mexico as
have been entering the United States across the southwest border,
according to Pew.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment