National Journal Magazine (Opinion)
By Ron Fournier
August 10, 2015
During
last week's GOP debate, I wrote a note to Donald Trump's supporters,
empathizing with their desire for destruction of the political status
quo while slamming their
hero-disrupter. I called Trump "a liar, a bully, and a sexist who
wouldn't give FOX News moderators a straight answer—a celebrity
billionaire who is treating your party like a trophy wife." I asked, "Is
this really what you want?"
My
email inbox, Twitter time line, and Facebook feed exploded with
replies, including this from Joe S. "Yes," he emailed. "[Trump] is
exactly what I want. I don't trust
politics."
You
are in shock, because for the first time, you realize that the people
do not need YOU to interpret what those running for office are saying.
We can understand them
just fine, we communicate with thousands of other people, not just our
close family circle of old.
The old political elite system is dead, and so is the media.
You're
right, Joe. I'm old enough to remember when a dozen or so journalists
in Washington set the political news agenda. Before the Internet
democratized the media, I
was a so-called gatekeeper: My core responsibility (and power) centered
less on what I reported than on what I chose not to report—not to share
with you.
For
better and for worse, those days are gone. Which is why I wrote
directly to you and other Trump followers. You have the power. You have
the responsibility. You get
the last word. You and millions of other justifiably angry Americans
can do us all a favor: Drive a stake in the "political elite system" and
replace it with something better.
Here's the rub: Is Trump something better? Is he the best you can do? Wouldn't you prefer a more credible vessel for change?
Joe M. addressed those questions after watching me discuss the Trump phenomena on TV.
I
often wonder why many of your fellow panelists have such trouble
understanding that indeed the American people, not those that just
happen to live in America, but Americans
in [their] best sense, are disgusted with our leadership.
And
let's not confine it to just our politicians. Add many businessmen,
educators, the ruling class, and even some in the Church. An abiding
contempt for their hypocritical
self-indulgence and dishonesty is large and growing. …
[Obviously]
Mr. Trump can't tell the difference between a political campaign and
his (ex)-TV show. Though his remarks about political-correctness and its
inference of
liberal intolerance will always be welcomed as most Americans are
heartily sick of it, particularly its one-way application.
Trump will shoot himself in the mouth, so little to worry about there.
I
don't know about that. As certain as I am that Trump would be a lousy
president, I am unsure about the future of his presidential campaign.
Politics has never been less
predictable.
Voter
anxiety runs broad and deep, and, unlike in past eras of populist
unrest, people are radically connected via the Internet—their anger
magnified and easily exploited
by agents of change. Forces that disrupted the music, retail,
financial, and media industries will eventually bring radical change to
politics. It's only a matter of time and a question of outcome: Will
that change be a force for good or a force for bad?
I ask again: Is Trump really the change you want?
Yes, replied Thomas G.
Donald
Trump is a symptom of the problem. Both political parties would rather
cater to noncitizens than respond to the tens of millions of
conservative Americans whose
only demand is that our federal government enforce the laws that have
been dutifully—constitutionally—passed.
Agreed:
Trump is a symptom of the problem. But he can't be the cure, even on
immigration. Trump favors deporting 11 million illegal immigrants before
returning most of
them to the United States. Of this expensive, if not unworkable, idea,
Trump told CNN recently, "I would have an expedited way of getting them
back into the country so they can be legal."
That's gold-plated amnesty. Is that really what you want?
Maybe not, replied Michael G.
As
to Donald Trump, while I don't see him as the best candidate, I don't
see him as the worst either. … [W]hen he said he could run as an
independent or not support the
Republican nominee, that said to me that he would not walk in lock-step
with the Republican Party if he disagreed with the direction they were
going in, and I could not disagree with that position. To expect someone
to fall in line no matter who the nominee
is, is almost un-American.
Jeff N. is a college-educated small-business owner who called himself "a very angry and disappointed American."
As
of right now, I am interested to see Mr. Trump become president. Why?
I am one of those "angry, anxious" Americans who is also so very tired
of the political rhetoric,
I am ready for something different. Even though eventually Mr. Trump
will probably be derailed by the system in place, I strongly feel as if
this could prove to be the start of a new direction. …
[Whether]
it be Mr. Trump or someone else, the direction this country is going,
with all of the corruption and the political elitists who treat
themselves as deserving
of their rewards for being in office, is wrong and it needs to be
fixed.
So
we're in agreement, these Trump backers and me: The two-party duopoly
is busted, and political elites need a kick in the butt. Where we differ
is on Trump himself,
who I consider to be part of the problem, whose celebrity and charisma
blind people to the fact that he's an elitist—a card-carrying member of
the status quo.
Lawton
J. came to a similar conclusion after the debate. "I have no use or
patience for Trump," Lawton emailed. "He is a bombastic buffoon."
I won't change my mind about Trump, but Joe S. is right; I don't matter much anymore. The question is whether his backers do.
For more information, go to: www.beverlyhillsimmigrationlaw.com
No comments:
Post a Comment